Day: November 16, 2025
Courtesy of Adarsh Alphons
- An eight-slide pitch deck helped raise money for Postmoda’s pivot to a platform that sells designer returns.
- The startup was originally a peer-to-peer clothing rental company.
- It has raised money from major VC firms, like Slow Ventures and Long Journey Ventures, as well as entrepreneurs.
We’ve all been there: You’re shopping online, amass a full cart, and check out.
You’re over budget, but chances are those jeans won’t fit right or that jacket will be too similar to the one you already own. At least one thing will end up in the return pile in your corner and make its way back to the seller.
E-commerce — with its ease of purchase and lack of trying on — has led to ballooning returns. About 20% of items purchased online are expected to be returned this year, according to an October report by the National Retail Federation.
Most of those returns are not relisted for sale. The costs — both in terms of time and labor — required to get products back online are often not worth it. Instead, items are loaded onto palettes to be sold to liquidators, shipped to other countries, or sent to a landfill.
“Where is it ending up? Nobody would talk to us about it. Brands wouldn’t talk to us, merchandising officers wouldn’t talk to us,” Adarsh Alphons, the cofounder and CEO of Postmoda, told Business Insider. “They wouldn’t acknowledge it as a problem.”
That’s because the answer isn’t good for business or the world at large. In 2023, apparel companies spent $25.1 billion in processing costs for returns, estimated a Coresight Research survey of 100 apparel retailers. That same year, more than 8 billion pounds of returns were sent to landfills, according to Optoro, a company specializing in returns solutions.
“They just think of it as the cost of doing business,” Alphons said.
He is hoping to solve that.
Postmoda, which launches to the public later this week, plans to offer luxury and designer returns — taking them off the hands of retailers, keeping them out of landfills, and offering them to shoppers at a discount.
This is Postmoda’s second form. The first, called Wardrobe, was a peer-to-peer apparel rental platform launched in 2021. Alphons raised $5.6 million over two funding rounds from investors such as Slow Ventures and Long Journey Ventures, he said.
But about a year after launch, he felt his business model, which used dry cleaners as middlemen, wasn’t scalable.
Alphons took a break to reassess the market and talk to stakeholders. Returns were a pain point — and they were becoming a bigger one.
“There was this huge slush that was growing because the return rates are so high because of e-commerce,” he said.
Alphons knew what he wanted to do — and after testing the theory by selling millions of returned items on Poshmark and eBay, he knew that it could work.
He just needed a little more money. He put together an eight-slide deck and went back to his original investors.
“They’re just so glad that I was able to find a business that is adjacent to our business and actually see revenue,” Alphons.
Existing investors, such as Opendoor cofounder JD Ross and Vine cofounder Rus Yusupov, hoped to capitalize on the growing number of returns and the increasingly popular secondhand luxury model. They invested an additional $200,000 in January 2023. Alphons said Postmoda has since been building tech and relationships with retailers.
Postmoda is far from the only early-stage company to attempt a pivot. Many successful businesses, such as Slack and YouTube, have achieved success by adapting their business models to meet market needs. The question is whether Postmoda can pull it off.
“Founding things usually has to do with persevering and staying at it,” Alphons said. “Overnight success is actually a very rare thing. It will be like five years, and then all of a sudden, you figure it out.”
Now that he has figured it out, he’s putting his foot on the gas. Next year, he plans on raising a Series A to scale up the marketplace and partnerships.
Here’s Postmoda’s pitch deck.
live: Elecciones en Chile
Life360
- Life360 CEO Lauren Antonoff told Business Insider that the secret to remote work was “more in-person meetings.”
- Antonoff said that Life360 put its budget for office space into travel for employee meet-ups.
- As for the return-to-office movement, Antonoff said that the philosophy “makes no sense.”
As hardcore work culture surges, many companies are demanding their employees return to the office for more and more days. Life360 is fine staying at home.
Much has changed for the family tracking app company since its 2024 IPO, including naming Microsoft and GoDaddy alum Lauren Antonoff as its new CEO. Antonoff was previously COO.
One thing that hasn’t changed is its remote work policy. In an interview with Business Insider, Antonoff said that the company was “remote-first” and that it wouldn’t be changing anytime soon.
“The secret of making remote work isn’t better online meetings, it’s more in-person meetings,” Antonoff said. “Life360 had taken the budget that used to be dedicated for buildings and those types of things and put it into travel.”
Antonoff called from a Deskpass coworking space, where she said some of the engineering leaders had congregated. She said that Life360’s in-person meet-ups were meant for “getting to know each other” and “working through one or two hard problems.”
“The return-to-office movements are all like, ‘Let’s just force people to sit next to each other while they all have their headsets and they’re on Zoom,'” Antonoff said. “It makes no sense.”
Life360 is one of a handful of companies leaning into remote work culture. Dropbox CEO Drew Houston compared RTO mandates to trying to get people back into malls and movie theaters.
Some companies, like Atlassian, have found that remote work is a hiring boon. Others, like Klarna, say they lost talent to companies with stronger in-person cultures.
Microsoft has also recently pushed for in-office work, moving to a three-day RTO. Microsoft EVP and CPO Amy Coleman said that the AI era requires the “kind of energy and momentum that comes from smart people working side by side.”
Antonoff said that she “grew up” at Microsoft, having spent nearly 20 years there. At Microsoft, Antonoff said that she was working with people in “different offices” around the world, even when she was in person.
Antonoff said she’s also seen how in-office culture can unfairly prize proximity.
“You bias the people who sit near you,” Antonoff said. “The eye-opener for me was when we all got forced to work remotely. It normalized very quickly that everybody was equidistant from the center of power.”
Antonoff has also worked at GoDaddy, where she served as president of the company’s US small business segment. She said that GoDaddy was “more productive during the pandemic.”
One of Antonoff’s other favorite workplace policies: synchronized vacations.
Twice a year, Life360’s about 500 employees all take one week off, save for a small slice of workers performing “critical functions,” Antonoff said.
Vacations are normally a “mixed blessing,” Antonoff said, because employees will return to a stack of work in their inbox. Some employees even check their emails while taking time off to avoid future pain, she said. Not at Life360.
“You really can take time off,” she said. “You really can unplug because you’re not missing out on meetings.”
“It’s like the best vacation you’ve ever had because a real vacation.”
Based on the content of the webpage, here is a summary:
The blog post, titled “The Gusinsky’s Revenge: The Investigation in tweets,” is Part 2 of an investigative series by Michael Novakhov. It appears to be presented as a collection of tweets.
The post centers on the theory that Vladimir Gusinsky, a prominent Russian media mogul and founder of the NTV television network, may be a prime suspect in ordering the murder of Mikhail Lesin, a former Russian press minister. It questions the FBI’s actions on the matter and notes that Gusinsky is “hiding in Israel and refuses to talk to the FBI.” The post also provides brief backgrounds on both Gusinsky and Lesin and their roles in the post-Soviet media landscape.
______________________________
Vladimir Gusinsky, Mikhail Lesin, and the FBI primarily involves investigations into potential financial crimes and Lesin’s mysterious 2015 death in Washington, D.C.
.- FBI Scrutiny: Russian media oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky has drawn FBI scrutiny in recent years, though he has never been charged with a crime. Agents questioned his now-estranged wife and household staff regarding his business dealings and associations.
- Charles McGonigal Connection: Gusinsky had long-standing personal and professional connections to Charles McGonigal, the former top counterintelligence agent in the FBI’s New York office. McGonigal, who investigated Russian oligarchs during his tenure, socialized and dined at Gusinsky’s home on multiple occasions.
- Indictment: In an unrelated case, McGonigal was later sentenced to prison for conspiring to violate U.S. sanctions and money laundering in connection with his work for another sanctioned Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska. Gusinsky was not implicated in this criminal case.
- Media Czar: Mikhail Lesin was a former Russian press minister and the “mastermind” behind the Kremlin-funded international news network RT, widely considered a propaganda tool by U.S. officials. As press minister, he played a central role in consolidating state control over independent media outlets, including forcing Gusinsky to cede control of the NTV channel.
- U.S. Investigations: In 2014, a U.S. Senator urged the FBI and the Justice Department to investigate whether Lesin was laundering ill-gotten gains through the purchase of over $28 million in Los Angeles real estate.
- Mysterious Death: Lesin died in a Washington D.C. hotel room in November 2015. The D.C. Chief Medical Examiner officially determined his death an accident caused by blunt force injuries from falls, with acute ethanol intoxication as a contributing factor.
- Conspiracy Theories: The official conclusion was met with skepticism, and alternative theories suggested murder. The FBI investigated the death as part of a metropolitan police homicide investigation and released files, which did not contradict the accidental death narrative but were heavily redacted. A private intelligence report (the “Steele dossier”) and other independent sources suggested Lesin was bludgeoned to death by enforcers working for a close Putin associate, potentially just before a scheduled meeting with U.S. Justice Department officials to discuss the inner workings of RT. Some theories even suggested Lesin was intending to cooperate with the FBI and enter witness protection.
The Gusinsky’s Revenge
Part 2 | Part 1
The Investigation in tweets

