Categories
The News And Times Blog

Israel will finish the job by itself, Netanyahu said about Iran

Spread the love


AI Overview

Earlier reports from February 17, 2025, indicated Netanyahu’s claim that Israel, with the support of the U.S., could “finish the job” against Iran’s “terror axis”. Reuters says.
According to reports from June 19, 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Israel intends to strike “all” of Iran’s nuclear facilities and is capable of doing so without U.S. assistance, although the U.S. is assisting with air defense efforts.
Netanyahu’s Recent Statements:
Netanyahu stated Israel can strike “all” of Iran’s nuclear facilities independently.
He acknowledged U.S. assistance with air defense, specifically mentioning “American pilots are intercepting drones alongside our pilots”.
Context of Previous Statements:
Statements from February 2025 indicated Netanyahu’s belief that Israel, with U.S. support, could defeat Iran’s “terror axis”. USA Today reported.
This “terror axis” includes groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.
Disagreement on Iran’s Nuclear Program:
Netanyahu asserts that Iran is rapidly advancing toward a nuclear weapon.
However, U.S. intelligence maintains that Iran suspended its nuclear weapons program in 2003. NPR reports.
U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard reiterated in March 2025 that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and its Supreme Leader has not authorized the program he suspended.
President Trump contradicted this, saying he believes Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear weapon.
Iran’s Nuclear Program:
The IAEA is not receiving the access it requires to certain sites in Iran and has not been shown plans for new nuclear facilities.
Iran has enriched a large amount of uranium to 60%, close to weapons-grade, and this could be enough for nearly 10 nuclear warheads.
The UN’s nuclear watchdog confirms Iran’s uranium enrichment to 60%.
Iran’s Foreign Minister claims its nuclear program is peaceful and believes nuclear weapons are illegitimate.
Current Situation:Israel has struck Iranian nuclear facilities, including the Arak heavy water reactor.
Iran launched a barrage of missiles at Israel, causing damage to a hospital and injuring people.
Israel claims to have eliminated a third of Iran’s arsenal and achieved air superiority in western Iran.
Trump has yet to decide on potential U.S. military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
While some voices in the U.S. call for non-intervention, Netanyahu argues that America’s interests are at stake in the conflict.

AI Mode
Israel will finish the job by itself, Netanyahu said about Iran
. Specifically, he said Israel has the power to “strike all the nuclear facilities” in Iran and will do so. He added that the decision for US military involvement rests with President Trump.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Israel will “finish the job” against Iran, emphasizing the country’s capability and intention to act independently, while acknowledging US support in air defense
Key Points:
Independent Action: Netanyahu stated that Israel has the capacity to achieve its goals against Iran’s nuclear facilities alone, but welcomes US contribution in defense.
US Support: While not requiring a “green light” for the operation, Netanyahu noted that the US, under the Trump administration, has been assisting with defense efforts, including American pilots intercepting drones alongside Israeli pilots.
No Immunity: Netanyahu has not ruled out the possibility of targeting Iran’s Supreme Leader, saying “no one in Iran should have immunity”.
Focus on Nuclear Facilities: Israel’s stated objective is to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program and strike all nuclear facilities, including those involved in enrichment.
Trump’s Role: President Trump has indicated he will make a decision regarding potential US involvement within two weeks, according to Forbes. The US has been considering the possibility of strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Context:
Current Conflict: The statements come amidst escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, marked by recent mutual attacks, including Iranian missile strikes on Israel.
Iran’s Response: Iran has warned against third-party involvement in the conflict and threatened a strong response to any further Israeli actions.
Diverted Criticism: Some analysts suggest that the strikes on Iran may have served to divert criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza.
Uncertainty of Outcome: Experts remain divided on the potential success of Israel’s military campaign and the possibility of a prolonged conflict.
Articles and Tweets

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

‘There were a lot of holes’: First juror in Karen Read’s retrial speaks out

Spread the love

The juror, only identified as Jason, spoke to TMZ following the verdict in the high profile retrial

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

Bruins Emerging as Potential Suitor to Steal Connor McDavid

Spread the love

The Boston Bruins could look to make a shocking move for Connor McDavid next offseason.

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

Party like it’s 2018: Democrats look back at 1st Trump midterms for 2025 races and beyond

Spread the love

Democrats have spent the early months of Trump’s second presidency trying to find the right messages and messengers to counter an aggressive administration. In the only two governor’s races of 2025, they have models that have worked before.

Spread the love
Categories
Articles and Tweets

Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement – Google Search google.com/search?q=Chang… AI Overview Recent news reports suggest that President Trump is extending the timeline for a decision regarding potential…

Spread the love

Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement – Google Search google.com/search?q=Chang… AI Overview Recent news reports suggest that President Trump is extending the timeline for a decision regarding potential…

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement – Google Search google.com/search?q=Chang… AI Overview Recent news reports suggest that President Trump is extending the timeline for a decision regarding potential…

Spread the love

Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement – Google Search google.com/search?q=Chang… AI Overview Recent news reports suggest that President Trump is extending the timeline for a decision regarding potential…

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

Mets will have a role in MLB trade deadline’s arms race

Spread the love

The Mets still lead MLB in starter ERA (2.95) but expect to be looking at starters at the deadline.

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz: no more guns at Capitol

Spread the love

The Minnesota governor also told reporters he hopes to have Melissa and Mark Hortman lie in state at the Capitol. And he said Yvette Hoffman could be released from the hospital as early as Thursday.

Spread the love
Categories
The News And Times Blog

Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement

Spread the love

Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement

AI Overview
two weeks. This shift in rhetoric is seen by some as a potential signal of increased opportunity for a negotiated settlement.Recent statements from the White House suggest that President Trump is extending the timeframe for a decision regarding potential U.S. involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, from a previously implied shorter period (e.g., “1-2 days”) toHere are some key takeaways from the situation:Extended Timeline: A White House representative indicated that President Trump will make a decision regarding potential action against Iran within two weeks.
Emphasis on Negotiation: The reason given for this timeframe is the possibility of negotiations with Iran.
Leaving the Door Open: This extended timeline suggests an openness to a diplomatic solution.
Possibility of a Diplomatic Solution: Trump has stated there is a significant chance for negotiations to address U.S. and Israeli concerns about Iran’s nuclear program.
It is important to remember that this situation is still unfolding, and the results of any potential negotiations are not yet known.

AI Mode
Change in time period Trump gave to Iran: from 1-2 days to two weeks indicates more chances for negotiated settlement
.Yes, President Trump’s statement that he will decide whether to involve the US in the Israel-Iran conflict within two weeks indicates a potential opening for a negotiated settlement
Reasoning:
Increased Timeframe: Extending the decision timeline from an implied shorter period to two weeks suggests a willingness to allow diplomacy more time to work.
“Substantial Chance of Negotiations”: The President cited a “substantial chance of negotiations” with Iran as the reason for delaying his decision, indicating a belief that diplomatic talks might yield a resolution.
Preference for Diplomacy: While maintaining the option of military action, the longer timeline allows for a greater emphasis on diplomatic solutions.
However, it’s important to note:
“May or May Not Take Place”: The “substantial chance of negotiations” is qualified with “may or may not take place,” indicating the possibility of a return to a more imminent decision on military action if negotiations fail.
Past Delays: The use of “two weeks” as a timeline has been seen as a “familiar metric” by some, raising questions about the reliability of this timeframe for a final decision.
Conflicting Signals: Trump’s rhetoric has sometimes been seen as contradictory, with some analysts noting his statements about seeking peace alongside actions that could lead to military intervention.
Continued Tensions: Even with the extended timeline, tensions remain high, and the possibility of escalation remains a concern.
In conclusion, while the two-week timeframe offers a window for potential negotiations, the situation remains fluid, and the outcome depends on the success of diplomatic efforts and the evolving dynamics of the conflict.

Spread the love
Categories
Selected Articles

Fossilized ‘Dragon Man’ skull clears up baffling ‘mystery’ behind early humans: scientists

Spread the love

The skull, unearthed nearly a century ago, has led to new revelations in the study of human evolution.

Spread the love