Sharm-El-Sheikh Accords 2025: Substance, pomp, and circumstance – AI Mode:
The accord was a multi-stage, U.S.-brokered deal between Israel and Hamas, with key mediation from Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey. The process was marked by significant diplomatic ceremony and political maneuvering, primarily led by U.S. President Donald Trump. The 2025 Sharm el-Sheikh Accords refer to a landmark peace agreement that ended the war in Gaza, signed in Egypt on October 9, 2025, and followed by an international summit to formalize the deal on October 13
Substance of the accords
The core of the agreement was a phased approach to de-escalation and postwar governance, though the most contentious issues were deferred.
Phase one (Implemented):
Ceasefire: Hostilities ceased on October 10, following the Israeli cabinet’s approval of the deal.
Hostage-prisoner exchange: Hamas released the remaining 20 living Israeli hostages in exchange for the release of 2,000 Palestinian prisoners by Israel, including 250 serving life sentences.
Humanitarian aid: The agreement provided for the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza.
Partial Israeli withdrawal: Israeli forces withdrew to pre-agreed lines within the Gaza Strip.
Unresolved issues (Postponed):
Future governance of Gaza: The deal did not resolve the long-term administration of Gaza after Hamas handed power to a “body of independent technocrats”.
Disarmament of Hamas: The most significant unresolved point was the demilitarization of Hamas, which remained a major point of contention for Israel.
Blockade and reconstruction: The terms for ending the Israeli blockade and financing Gaza’s reconstruction were left for later stages.
Israeli withdrawal: Complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza was conditioned on future stages of the agreement.
Pomp and circumstance
The signing and summit were characterized by significant fanfare and diplomatic spectacle, with many elements carefully orchestrated by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Trump’s “victory lap”: The event was framed as a major personal diplomatic victory for Trump, who arrived in the region to attend the summit in Egypt after a triumphant speech at the Israeli Knesset. He publicly expressed his pride in the achievement and his hope for future diplomatic wins.
Summit in Sharm el-Sheikh: More than 20 world leaders attended the international peace summit hosted by Trump and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. A key document outlining the groundwork for Gaza’s future was signed by Trump and the leaders of Egypt, Turkey, and Qatar.
Red carpet treatment: Arab allies in the region reportedly gave Trump a warm reception, consistent with the diplomatic style he had received on previous visits.
High-profile figures: Mediators included Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff. Tony Blair was tapped to lead an international transitional administration for Gaza.
Nobel ambitions: Trump’s prominent role in the negotiations and his promotion of the deal were widely viewed as an effort to win the Nobel Peace Prize, though he ultimately did not receive it.
Memorable moments: The trip featured several notable moments, such as Trump’s call for Pakistan’s prime minister to state that Trump deserved the Nobel Prize.
Limitations and implications
While the accords secured a critical ceasefire and hostage exchange, the lasting implications of the agreement are uncertain due to several unresolved issues.
Israeli absence: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not present at the Sharm el-Sheikh summit, officially citing a religious holiday. His absence was criticized by Israeli opposition figures and highlighted the remaining political divisions.
Opaque details: The signed document outlining the rules for Gaza’s future was not made public, raising questions about its specifics and enforceability.
Threat of renewed conflict: With Hamas still armed and Israel’s intentions unclear on a permanent withdrawal, the risk of a new conflict remains significant.
Uncertain future for Gaza: Key questions about Gaza’s governance and reconstruction remain open, dependent on future negotiations that were only beginning as the summit concluded.— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 13, 2025
Categories